• Stop de windmolens / windturbines, ze vernietigen de bio diversiteit
    Stop de windmolens / windturbines, ze vernietigen de bio diversiteit
    1
    0 0 Reacties 0 Shares
  • Sensationele LIAM windenergie methode uitvinding door nederlanders/ #windturbine
    Sensationele LIAM windenergie methode uitvinding door nederlanders/ #windturbine
    1
    0 0 Reacties 0 Shares
  • turbines

    Groen Beleid is meer een verdienmodel / de economie flora en fauna worden erdoor verziekt en daar gaat men dan weer geld aan te verdienen met een nep oplossing zoals met de EU groene deal

    Reasons why wind turbines cannot replace fossil fuels.

    1 Windmills require petroleum every single step of their life cycle. If they can’t replicate themselves using wind turbine generated electricity, they are not sustainable.
    2 SCALE. Too many windmills needed to replace fossil fuels.
    3 SCALE. Wind turbines can’t be built fast enough to replace fossils
    4 Not enough materials such as rare earth metals or fossil fueled heat to create the cement, steel, epoxy, and other parts needed.
    5 Not enough dispatchable power, such as natural gas or hydropower, to balance wind intermittency and unreliability.
    6 Wind blows seasonally, so for much of there year there isn’t much wind.
    7 When too much wind is blowing for the grid to cope with and not blackout, it has to be curtailed. If the wind is over 55 mph the wind turbine also has to shut down or risk being damaged.
    8 The best wind areas will never be developed – they’re too far from cities and the Grid.
    9 The Grid Can’t Handle Wind Power without natural gas.
    10 The role of the grid is to keep the supply of power steady and predictable. Wind does the opposite, at some point of penetration it may become impossible to keep the grid from crashing.
    11 Windmills wouldn’t be built without huge subsidies and tax breaks.
    12 Tremendous environmental damage from mining material for windmills.
    13 Wind is only strong enough to justify windmills in a few regions.
    14 The electric grid needs to be much larger than it is now.
    15 Wind blows the strongest when customer demand is the weakest.
    16 No utility scale energy storage in sight.
    17 Wind Power surges harm industrial customers.
    18 Energy returned on Energy Invested is negative.
    19 Wind Turbines break down too often.
    20 Wind doesn’t reduce CO2.
    21 Turbines increase the cost of farming.
    22 Offshore Windmills battered by waves, wind, ice, corrosion, a hazard to ships and ecosystems.
    23 Wind turbines are far more expensive than they appear to be.
    24 Wind turbines are already going out of business and fewer built in Europe.
    25 Windmills are so huge they’ve reached the limits of land transportation by truck or rail.
    26 Windmills may only last 12 to 15 years, or at best 20 years.
    27 Offshore wind turbines could affect fisheries.
    28 Wind has a low capacity Factor.
    29 The quality of wind resources is location specific, with the best locations often found far from the load center where the transmission grid already exists.
    30 Dead bugs and salt reduce wind power generation by 20 to 30%
    31 Germany has been spending more for much longer than other nations, and Energiewiende is a huge failure.
    32 Wind turbines more expensive to decommission than construct so often not recycled.
    33 Decommissioning wind turbines costs as much as $500,000 per wind turbine.
    34 Wind turbines threaten biodiversity in hundreds of protected, key biodiversity, and wilderness areas.
    35 Wind turbines and solar PV depend on the energy storage of coal and natural gas plants to provide power when the wind dies.
    36 Operations and Maintenance (O&M) costs are too high.
    Increasingly high insurance costs from hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, defective equipment, untrained personnel and more
    37 Turbines can’t be improved much, they are nearing the maximum possible harvesting of wind.
    Turbines are so heavy they damage roads during delivery
    38 Not enough metallurgical coal to make the steel for wind turbines.
    39 When oil prices rise, the cost of building wind turbines rises.
    40 Electricity can’t make cement, steel, glass, bricks, ceramics.
    41 Wind turbines are ecologically destructive.
    42 Supply chains: wind turbines need 10 times the materials of conventional energy technologies.
    43 Wind turbines are buckling and toppling, splatting wind blades across fields and oceans. See Nantucket.
    44 We can’t make wind turbines more efficient because we don’t understand turbulence.
    45 Peak wind? Wind generation declined in 2023 for the first time since the 1990s.
    46 Betz Limit of 59% — another 10-fold increase is not possible.
    As Warren Buffett said, " "For example, on wind energy, we get a tax credit if we build a lot of wind farms. That's the only reason to build them. They don't make sense without the tax credit."
    While the wind production tax credit may be great for the rich, it's harmful for taxpayers and energy consumers. The more wind turbines the higher the cost of electricity, and who suffers the most? The poor. #GreenEnergy #windturbine #windenergie
    turbines Groen Beleid is meer een verdienmodel / de economie flora en fauna worden erdoor verziekt en daar gaat men dan weer geld aan te verdienen met een nep oplossing zoals met de EU groene deal Reasons why wind turbines cannot replace fossil fuels. 1 Windmills require petroleum every single step of their life cycle. If they can’t replicate themselves using wind turbine generated electricity, they are not sustainable. 2 SCALE. Too many windmills needed to replace fossil fuels. 3 SCALE. Wind turbines can’t be built fast enough to replace fossils 4 Not enough materials such as rare earth metals or fossil fueled heat to create the cement, steel, epoxy, and other parts needed. 5 Not enough dispatchable power, such as natural gas or hydropower, to balance wind intermittency and unreliability. 6 Wind blows seasonally, so for much of there year there isn’t much wind. 7 When too much wind is blowing for the grid to cope with and not blackout, it has to be curtailed. If the wind is over 55 mph the wind turbine also has to shut down or risk being damaged. 8 The best wind areas will never be developed – they’re too far from cities and the Grid. 9 The Grid Can’t Handle Wind Power without natural gas. 10 The role of the grid is to keep the supply of power steady and predictable. Wind does the opposite, at some point of penetration it may become impossible to keep the grid from crashing. 11 Windmills wouldn’t be built without huge subsidies and tax breaks. 12 Tremendous environmental damage from mining material for windmills. 13 Wind is only strong enough to justify windmills in a few regions. 14 The electric grid needs to be much larger than it is now. 15 Wind blows the strongest when customer demand is the weakest. 16 No utility scale energy storage in sight. 17 Wind Power surges harm industrial customers. 18 Energy returned on Energy Invested is negative. 19 Wind Turbines break down too often. 20 Wind doesn’t reduce CO2. 21 Turbines increase the cost of farming. 22 Offshore Windmills battered by waves, wind, ice, corrosion, a hazard to ships and ecosystems. 23 Wind turbines are far more expensive than they appear to be. 24 Wind turbines are already going out of business and fewer built in Europe. 25 Windmills are so huge they’ve reached the limits of land transportation by truck or rail. 26 Windmills may only last 12 to 15 years, or at best 20 years. 27 Offshore wind turbines could affect fisheries. 28 Wind has a low capacity Factor. 29 The quality of wind resources is location specific, with the best locations often found far from the load center where the transmission grid already exists. 30 Dead bugs and salt reduce wind power generation by 20 to 30% 31 Germany has been spending more for much longer than other nations, and Energiewiende is a huge failure. 32 Wind turbines more expensive to decommission than construct so often not recycled. 33 Decommissioning wind turbines costs as much as $500,000 per wind turbine. 34 Wind turbines threaten biodiversity in hundreds of protected, key biodiversity, and wilderness areas. 35 Wind turbines and solar PV depend on the energy storage of coal and natural gas plants to provide power when the wind dies. 36 Operations and Maintenance (O&M) costs are too high. Increasingly high insurance costs from hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, defective equipment, untrained personnel and more 37 Turbines can’t be improved much, they are nearing the maximum possible harvesting of wind. Turbines are so heavy they damage roads during delivery 38 Not enough metallurgical coal to make the steel for wind turbines. 39 When oil prices rise, the cost of building wind turbines rises. 40 Electricity can’t make cement, steel, glass, bricks, ceramics. 41 Wind turbines are ecologically destructive. 42 Supply chains: wind turbines need 10 times the materials of conventional energy technologies. 43 Wind turbines are buckling and toppling, splatting wind blades across fields and oceans. See Nantucket. 44 We can’t make wind turbines more efficient because we don’t understand turbulence. 45 Peak wind? Wind generation declined in 2023 for the first time since the 1990s. 46 Betz Limit of 59% — another 10-fold increase is not possible. As Warren Buffett said, " "For example, on wind energy, we get a tax credit if we build a lot of wind farms. That's the only reason to build them. They don't make sense without the tax credit." While the wind production tax credit may be great for the rich, it's harmful for taxpayers and energy consumers. The more wind turbines the higher the cost of electricity, and who suffers the most? The poor. #GreenEnergy #windturbine #windenergie
    1 0 Reacties 0 Shares
  • wind turbines en zonnepanelen zijn erg slecht voor flora en fauna/ gevaarlijk en niet duurzaam

    Giftige chemicaliën, gassen en bijproducten bij de productie van zonnepanelen:

    Chemicaliën: zoutzuur, waterstoffluoride, natriumhydroxide, zwavelzuur, salpeterzuur, waterstoffluoride, fosfine en arseengas, fosforoxychloride en fosfortrichloride, dibroomboor

    46 Reasons why wind turbines cannot replace fossil fuels.

    1 Windmills require petroleum every single step of their life cycle. If they can’t replicate themselves using wind turbine generated electricity, they are not sustainable.
    2 SCALE. Too many windmills needed to replace fossil fuels.
    3 SCALE. Wind turbines can’t be built fast enough to replace fossils
    4 Not enough materials such as rare earth metals or fossil fueled heat to create the cement, steel, epoxy, and other parts needed.
    5 Not enough dispatchable power, such as natural gas or hydropower, to balance wind intermittency and unreliability.
    6 Wind blows seasonally, so for much of there year there isn’t much wind.
    7 When too much wind is blowing for the grid to cope with and not blackout, it has to be curtailed. If the wind is over 55 mph the wind turbine also has to shut down or risk being damaged.
    8 The best wind areas will never be developed – they’re too far from cities and the Grid.
    9 The Grid Can’t Handle Wind Power without natural gas.
    10 The role of the grid is to keep the supply of power steady and predictable. Wind does the opposite, at some point of penetration it may become impossible to keep the grid from crashing.
    11 Windmills wouldn’t be built without huge subsidies and tax breaks.
    12 Tremendous environmental damage from mining material for windmills.
    13 Wind is only strong enough to justify windmills in a few regions.
    14 The electric grid needs to be much larger than it is now.
    15 Wind blows the strongest when customer demand is the weakest.
    16 No utility scale energy storage in sight.
    17 Wind Power surges harm industrial customers.
    18 Energy returned on Energy Invested is negative.
    19 Wind Turbines break down too often.
    20 Wind doesn’t reduce CO2.
    21 Turbines increase the cost of farming.
    22 Offshore Windmills battered by waves, wind, ice, corrosion, a hazard to ships and ecosystems.
    23 Wind turbines are far more expensive than they appear to be.
    24 Wind turbines are already going out of business and fewer built in Europe.
    25 Windmills are so huge they’ve reached the limits of land transportation by truck or rail.
    26 Windmills may only last 12 to 15 years, or at best 20 years.
    27 Offshore wind turbines could affect fisheries.
    28 Wind has a low capacity Factor.
    29 The quality of wind resources is location specific, with the best locations often found far from the load center where the transmission grid already exists.
    30 Dead bugs and salt reduce wind power generation by 20 to 30%
    31 Germany has been spending more for much longer than other nations, and Energiewiende is a huge failure.
    32 Wind turbines more expensive to decommission than construct so often not recycled.
    33 Decommissioning wind turbines costs as much as $500,000 per wind turbine.
    34 Wind turbines threaten biodiversity in hundreds of protected, key biodiversity, and wilderness areas.
    35 Wind turbines and solar PV depend on the energy storage of coal and natural gas plants to provide power when the wind dies.
    36 Operations and Maintenance (O&M) costs are too high.
    Increasingly high insurance costs from hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, defective equipment, untrained personnel and more
    37 Turbines can’t be improved much, they are nearing the maximum possible harvesting of wind.
    Turbines are so heavy they damage roads during delivery
    38 Not enough metallurgical coal to make the steel for wind turbines.
    39 When oil prices rise, the cost of building wind turbines rises.
    40 Electricity can’t make cement, steel, glass, bricks, ceramics.
    41 Wind turbines are ecologically destructive.
    42 Supply chains: wind turbines need 10 times the materials of conventional energy technologies.
    43 Wind turbines are buckling and toppling, splatting wind blades across fields and oceans. See Nantucket.
    44 We can’t make wind turbines more efficient because we don’t understand turbulence.
    45 Peak wind? Wind generation declined in 2023 for the first time since the 1990s.
    46 Betz Limit of 59% — another 10-fold increase is not possible.
    As Warren Buffett said, " "For example, on wind energy, we get a tax credit if we build a lot of wind farms. That's the only reason to build them. They don't make sense without the tax credit."
    While the wind production tax credit may be great for the rich, it's harmful for taxpayers and energy consumers. The more wind turbines the higher the cost of electricity, and who suffers the most? The poor. #GreenEnergy #windturbine #windenergie

    https://amsterboek.nl/posts/5003
    wind turbines en zonnepanelen zijn erg slecht voor flora en fauna/ gevaarlijk en niet duurzaam Giftige chemicaliën, gassen en bijproducten bij de productie van zonnepanelen: Chemicaliën: zoutzuur, waterstoffluoride, natriumhydroxide, zwavelzuur, salpeterzuur, waterstoffluoride, fosfine en arseengas, fosforoxychloride en fosfortrichloride, dibroomboor 46 Reasons why wind turbines cannot replace fossil fuels. 1 Windmills require petroleum every single step of their life cycle. If they can’t replicate themselves using wind turbine generated electricity, they are not sustainable. 2 SCALE. Too many windmills needed to replace fossil fuels. 3 SCALE. Wind turbines can’t be built fast enough to replace fossils 4 Not enough materials such as rare earth metals or fossil fueled heat to create the cement, steel, epoxy, and other parts needed. 5 Not enough dispatchable power, such as natural gas or hydropower, to balance wind intermittency and unreliability. 6 Wind blows seasonally, so for much of there year there isn’t much wind. 7 When too much wind is blowing for the grid to cope with and not blackout, it has to be curtailed. If the wind is over 55 mph the wind turbine also has to shut down or risk being damaged. 8 The best wind areas will never be developed – they’re too far from cities and the Grid. 9 The Grid Can’t Handle Wind Power without natural gas. 10 The role of the grid is to keep the supply of power steady and predictable. Wind does the opposite, at some point of penetration it may become impossible to keep the grid from crashing. 11 Windmills wouldn’t be built without huge subsidies and tax breaks. 12 Tremendous environmental damage from mining material for windmills. 13 Wind is only strong enough to justify windmills in a few regions. 14 The electric grid needs to be much larger than it is now. 15 Wind blows the strongest when customer demand is the weakest. 16 No utility scale energy storage in sight. 17 Wind Power surges harm industrial customers. 18 Energy returned on Energy Invested is negative. 19 Wind Turbines break down too often. 20 Wind doesn’t reduce CO2. 21 Turbines increase the cost of farming. 22 Offshore Windmills battered by waves, wind, ice, corrosion, a hazard to ships and ecosystems. 23 Wind turbines are far more expensive than they appear to be. 24 Wind turbines are already going out of business and fewer built in Europe. 25 Windmills are so huge they’ve reached the limits of land transportation by truck or rail. 26 Windmills may only last 12 to 15 years, or at best 20 years. 27 Offshore wind turbines could affect fisheries. 28 Wind has a low capacity Factor. 29 The quality of wind resources is location specific, with the best locations often found far from the load center where the transmission grid already exists. 30 Dead bugs and salt reduce wind power generation by 20 to 30% 31 Germany has been spending more for much longer than other nations, and Energiewiende is a huge failure. 32 Wind turbines more expensive to decommission than construct so often not recycled. 33 Decommissioning wind turbines costs as much as $500,000 per wind turbine. 34 Wind turbines threaten biodiversity in hundreds of protected, key biodiversity, and wilderness areas. 35 Wind turbines and solar PV depend on the energy storage of coal and natural gas plants to provide power when the wind dies. 36 Operations and Maintenance (O&M) costs are too high. Increasingly high insurance costs from hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, defective equipment, untrained personnel and more 37 Turbines can’t be improved much, they are nearing the maximum possible harvesting of wind. Turbines are so heavy they damage roads during delivery 38 Not enough metallurgical coal to make the steel for wind turbines. 39 When oil prices rise, the cost of building wind turbines rises. 40 Electricity can’t make cement, steel, glass, bricks, ceramics. 41 Wind turbines are ecologically destructive. 42 Supply chains: wind turbines need 10 times the materials of conventional energy technologies. 43 Wind turbines are buckling and toppling, splatting wind blades across fields and oceans. See Nantucket. 44 We can’t make wind turbines more efficient because we don’t understand turbulence. 45 Peak wind? Wind generation declined in 2023 for the first time since the 1990s. 46 Betz Limit of 59% — another 10-fold increase is not possible. As Warren Buffett said, " "For example, on wind energy, we get a tax credit if we build a lot of wind farms. That's the only reason to build them. They don't make sense without the tax credit." While the wind production tax credit may be great for the rich, it's harmful for taxpayers and energy consumers. The more wind turbines the higher the cost of electricity, and who suffers the most? The poor. #GreenEnergy #windturbine #windenergie https://amsterboek.nl/posts/5003
    AMSTERBOEK.NL
    Stan Rams - 46 Reasons why wind turbines cannot replace fossil...
    46 Reasons why wind turbines cannot replace fossil fuels. 1 Windmills require petroleum every single step of their life cycle. If they can’t replicate themselves using wind turbine generated electricity, they are not sustainable. 2 SCALE. Too many windmills needed to replace fossil fuels. 3...
    1
    0 Reacties 0 Shares
  • 46 Reasons why wind turbines cannot replace fossil fuels.
    1 Windmills require petroleum every single step of their life cycle. If they can’t replicate themselves using wind turbine generated electricity, they are not sustainable.
    2 SCALE. Too many windmills needed to replace fossil fuels.
    3 SCALE. Wind turbines can’t be built fast enough to replace fossils
    4 Not enough materials such as rare earth metals or fossil fueled heat to create the cement, steel, epoxy, and other parts needed.
    5 Not enough dispatchable power, such as natural gas or hydropower, to balance wind intermittency and unreliability.
    6 Wind blows seasonally, so for much of there year there isn’t much wind.
    7 When too much wind is blowing for the grid to cope with and not blackout, it has to be curtailed. If the wind is over 55 mph the wind turbine also has to shut down or risk being damaged.
    8 The best wind areas will never be developed – they’re too far from cities and the Grid.
    9 The Grid Can’t Handle Wind Power without natural gas.
    10 The role of the grid is to keep the supply of power steady and predictable. Wind does the opposite, at some point of penetration it may become impossible to keep the grid from crashing.
    11 Windmills wouldn’t be built without huge subsidies and tax breaks.
    12 Tremendous environmental damage from mining material for windmills.
    13 Wind is only strong enough to justify windmills in a few regions.
    14 The electric grid needs to be much larger than it is now.
    15 Wind blows the strongest when customer demand is the weakest.
    16 No utility scale energy storage in sight.
    17 Wind Power surges harm industrial customers.
    18 Energy returned on Energy Invested is negative.
    19 Wind Turbines break down too often.
    20 Wind doesn’t reduce CO2.
    21 Turbines increase the cost of farming.
    22 Offshore Windmills battered by waves, wind, ice, corrosion, a hazard to ships and ecosystems.
    23 Wind turbines are far more expensive than they appear to be.
    24 Wind turbines are already going out of business and fewer built in Europe.
    25 Windmills are so huge they’ve reached the limits of land transportation by truck or rail.
    26 Windmills may only last 12 to 15 years, or at best 20 years.
    27 Offshore wind turbines could affect fisheries.
    28 Wind has a low capacity Factor.
    29 The quality of wind resources is location specific, with the best locations often found far from the load center where the transmission grid already exists.
    30 Dead bugs and salt reduce wind power generation by 20 to 30%
    31 Germany has been spending more for much longer than other nations, and Energiewiende is a huge failure.
    32 Wind turbines more expensive to decommission than construct so often not recycled.
    33 Decommissioning wind turbines costs as much as $500,000 per wind turbine.
    34 Wind turbines threaten biodiversity in hundreds of protected, key biodiversity, and wilderness areas.
    35 Wind turbines and solar PV depend on the energy storage of coal and natural gas plants to provide power when the wind dies.
    36 Operations and Maintenance (O&M) costs are too high.
    Increasingly high insurance costs from hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, defective equipment, untrained personnel and more
    37 Turbines can’t be improved much, they are nearing the maximum possible harvesting of wind.
    Turbines are so heavy they damage roads during delivery
    38 Not enough metallurgical coal to make the steel for wind turbines.
    39 When oil prices rise, the cost of building wind turbines rises.
    40 Electricity can’t make cement, steel, glass, bricks, ceramics.
    41 Wind turbines are ecologically destructive.
    42 Supply chains: wind turbines need 10 times the materials of conventional energy technologies.
    43 Wind turbines are buckling and toppling, splatting wind blades across fields and oceans. See Nantucket.
    44 We can’t make wind turbines more efficient because we don’t understand turbulence.
    45 Peak wind? Wind generation declined in 2023 for the first time since the 1990s.
    46 Betz Limit of 59% — another 10-fold increase is not possible.
    As Warren Buffett said, " "For example, on wind energy, we get a tax credit if we build a lot of wind farms. That's the only reason to build them. They don't make sense without the tax credit."
    While the wind production tax credit may be great for the rich, it's harmful for taxpayers and energy consumers. The more wind turbines the higher the cost of electricity, and who suffers the most? The poor. #GreenEnergy #windturbine #windenergie
    46 Reasons why wind turbines cannot replace fossil fuels. 1 Windmills require petroleum every single step of their life cycle. If they can’t replicate themselves using wind turbine generated electricity, they are not sustainable. 2 SCALE. Too many windmills needed to replace fossil fuels. 3 SCALE. Wind turbines can’t be built fast enough to replace fossils 4 Not enough materials such as rare earth metals or fossil fueled heat to create the cement, steel, epoxy, and other parts needed. 5 Not enough dispatchable power, such as natural gas or hydropower, to balance wind intermittency and unreliability. 6 Wind blows seasonally, so for much of there year there isn’t much wind. 7 When too much wind is blowing for the grid to cope with and not blackout, it has to be curtailed. If the wind is over 55 mph the wind turbine also has to shut down or risk being damaged. 8 The best wind areas will never be developed – they’re too far from cities and the Grid. 9 The Grid Can’t Handle Wind Power without natural gas. 10 The role of the grid is to keep the supply of power steady and predictable. Wind does the opposite, at some point of penetration it may become impossible to keep the grid from crashing. 11 Windmills wouldn’t be built without huge subsidies and tax breaks. 12 Tremendous environmental damage from mining material for windmills. 13 Wind is only strong enough to justify windmills in a few regions. 14 The electric grid needs to be much larger than it is now. 15 Wind blows the strongest when customer demand is the weakest. 16 No utility scale energy storage in sight. 17 Wind Power surges harm industrial customers. 18 Energy returned on Energy Invested is negative. 19 Wind Turbines break down too often. 20 Wind doesn’t reduce CO2. 21 Turbines increase the cost of farming. 22 Offshore Windmills battered by waves, wind, ice, corrosion, a hazard to ships and ecosystems. 23 Wind turbines are far more expensive than they appear to be. 24 Wind turbines are already going out of business and fewer built in Europe. 25 Windmills are so huge they’ve reached the limits of land transportation by truck or rail. 26 Windmills may only last 12 to 15 years, or at best 20 years. 27 Offshore wind turbines could affect fisheries. 28 Wind has a low capacity Factor. 29 The quality of wind resources is location specific, with the best locations often found far from the load center where the transmission grid already exists. 30 Dead bugs and salt reduce wind power generation by 20 to 30% 31 Germany has been spending more for much longer than other nations, and Energiewiende is a huge failure. 32 Wind turbines more expensive to decommission than construct so often not recycled. 33 Decommissioning wind turbines costs as much as $500,000 per wind turbine. 34 Wind turbines threaten biodiversity in hundreds of protected, key biodiversity, and wilderness areas. 35 Wind turbines and solar PV depend on the energy storage of coal and natural gas plants to provide power when the wind dies. 36 Operations and Maintenance (O&M) costs are too high. Increasingly high insurance costs from hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, defective equipment, untrained personnel and more 37 Turbines can’t be improved much, they are nearing the maximum possible harvesting of wind. Turbines are so heavy they damage roads during delivery 38 Not enough metallurgical coal to make the steel for wind turbines. 39 When oil prices rise, the cost of building wind turbines rises. 40 Electricity can’t make cement, steel, glass, bricks, ceramics. 41 Wind turbines are ecologically destructive. 42 Supply chains: wind turbines need 10 times the materials of conventional energy technologies. 43 Wind turbines are buckling and toppling, splatting wind blades across fields and oceans. See Nantucket. 44 We can’t make wind turbines more efficient because we don’t understand turbulence. 45 Peak wind? Wind generation declined in 2023 for the first time since the 1990s. 46 Betz Limit of 59% — another 10-fold increase is not possible. As Warren Buffett said, " "For example, on wind energy, we get a tax credit if we build a lot of wind farms. That's the only reason to build them. They don't make sense without the tax credit." While the wind production tax credit may be great for the rich, it's harmful for taxpayers and energy consumers. The more wind turbines the higher the cost of electricity, and who suffers the most? The poor. #GreenEnergy #windturbine #windenergie
    1
    0 2 Reacties 0 Shares
  • NASA-STUDIE (2012): WINDTURBINES VEROORZAKEN OPWARMING VAN DE OPPERVLAKTETEMPERATUUR VAN DE AARDE

    In 2012 heeft NASA een studie gepubliceerd met satellietgegevens waaruit bleek dat de landoppervlaktetemperatuur in een gebied in het midden van Texas - waar vier grote windparken staan - 0,72° C warmer was dan de nabijgelegen gebieden zonder windparken.

    De temperatuur vh landoppervlak werd gemeten tussen 2003 en 2011 met behulp van gegevens van de MODIS-instrumenten (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) op de satellieten Aqua en Terra van NASA. De wetenschappers concludeerden uit alle data dat de hogere oppervlaktetemperatuur te wijten was aan de lokale meteorologische effecten van de turbines.

    De resultaten werden gepubliceerd in Nature Climate Change op 29 april 2012.

    https://nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/tx-wind-farm.html

    Windturbines werken als ventilatoren die 's nachts warmere lucht naar het oppervlak trekken. 's Nachts ontstaat er een speciale luchtstratificatie waarbij de lucht direct boven de grond relatief koeler is, terwijl het daarboven warmer is. Deze koude lucht zorgt ervoor dat de grond ook afkoelt. Maar ... windturbines mengen deze luchtlagen, waardoor koude lucht omhoog gaat en warme lucht omlaag. Hierdoor stijgt de luchttemperatuur boven het oppervlak, dat dan minder afkoelt en warmer blijft.

    Hoewel dit fenomeen al sinds 2012 bekend is, is er vrijwel geen verder onderzoek naar gedaan. Dit is zonder meer vreemd nu " climate change " hoog op de agenda staat en er sinds 2003 wereldwijd, inclusief in de EU, 60% meer windturbines zijn bijgeplaatst wat mogelijk een verdere stijging van de oppervlaktetemperatuur in de hand werkt.

    Een stijging van de oppervlakte temperatuur met 0,72° C lijkt niet veel maar is volgens de norm ontzettend veel wanneer men bedenkt dat klimaathysterici claimen dat de temperatuur van de aarde sinds 1850 al met 1,2° graden gestegen is en zware investeringen en dito inspanningen vereist zijn om een verdere stijging te vermijden.

    Experimenteel natuurkundige Gerd Ganteför ziet - anno 2023 - nog andere gevaren die veel belangrijker zijn, met name de kwestie van verdamping die in de NASA-studie niet werd besproken, maar wel in andere gepubliceerde studies.
    Grote windturbines vertragen logischerwijs de wind. Minder wind betekent minder verdamping en dus minder neerslag. Dit heeft invloed op de vochtige luchtstroom die vanuit de Noord-Atlantische Oceaan over zee naar Europa komt. Als het droger wordt, kan dit leiden tot een warmer klimaat.
    Vochtigheid en bodemvochtigheid zijn belangrijk voor de landbouw. Als er te veel windturbines worden geplaatst, heeft dit gevolgen voor het klimaat.

    https://nordkurier.de/politik/alarmierende-studie-klimaerwaermung-durch-windraeder-1625706

    Er bestaan veel klimaatmodelberekeningen voor de hele planeet, maar die richten zich uitsluitend op de verandering van het klimaat door CO2-concentraties. (Let wel: het zijn slechts modellen die niet op feiten zijn gebaseerd! ). Over het effect van windturbines op het klimaat is zeer weinig bekend en .... het wordt helaas ook niet onderzocht.

    Het meten van de temperatuur van het landoppervlak is één van de parameters die worden gebruikt voor de beoordeling van de opwarming van de aarde.

    Er wordt luid geroepen dat de opwarming van de aarde wordt veroorzaakt door broeikasgassen en CO2, terwijl het al lang bekend is dat slechts 0,04% van onze atmosfeer uit CO2 bestaat en de impact van broeikasgassen beperkt is.
    Waarom wordt er geen rekening gehouden met de stijging van oppervlaktetemperatuur van de aarde die wordt veroorzaakt door windturbines (en mogelijk nog andere industriële installaties), de droogte die ze veroorzaken, verminderde verdamping en minder neerslag?

    Omdat ... windturbines een businessmodel zijn waar miljarden mee verdiend worden en er met een beweerde CO2 vervuiling ook een aardige cent te verdienen valt op de kap van de bevolking, de landbouw en de industrie.

    Overheden plannen tegen 2030 respectievelijk 2050 nog tienduizenden bijkomende windturbines ter land, in meren en oceanen.
    NASA-STUDIE (2012): WINDTURBINES VEROORZAKEN OPWARMING VAN DE OPPERVLAKTETEMPERATUUR VAN DE AARDE In 2012 heeft NASA een studie gepubliceerd met satellietgegevens waaruit bleek dat de landoppervlaktetemperatuur in een gebied in het midden van Texas - waar vier grote windparken staan - 0,72° C warmer was dan de nabijgelegen gebieden zonder windparken. De temperatuur vh landoppervlak werd gemeten tussen 2003 en 2011 met behulp van gegevens van de MODIS-instrumenten (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) op de satellieten Aqua en Terra van NASA. De wetenschappers concludeerden uit alle data dat de hogere oppervlaktetemperatuur te wijten was aan de lokale meteorologische effecten van de turbines. De resultaten werden gepubliceerd in Nature Climate Change op 29 april 2012. https://nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/tx-wind-farm.html Windturbines werken als ventilatoren die 's nachts warmere lucht naar het oppervlak trekken. 's Nachts ontstaat er een speciale luchtstratificatie waarbij de lucht direct boven de grond relatief koeler is, terwijl het daarboven warmer is. Deze koude lucht zorgt ervoor dat de grond ook afkoelt. Maar ... windturbines mengen deze luchtlagen, waardoor koude lucht omhoog gaat en warme lucht omlaag. Hierdoor stijgt de luchttemperatuur boven het oppervlak, dat dan minder afkoelt en warmer blijft. Hoewel dit fenomeen al sinds 2012 bekend is, is er vrijwel geen verder onderzoek naar gedaan. Dit is zonder meer vreemd nu " climate change " hoog op de agenda staat en er sinds 2003 wereldwijd, inclusief in de EU, 60% meer windturbines zijn bijgeplaatst wat mogelijk een verdere stijging van de oppervlaktetemperatuur in de hand werkt. Een stijging van de oppervlakte temperatuur met 0,72° C lijkt niet veel maar is volgens de norm ontzettend veel wanneer men bedenkt dat klimaathysterici claimen dat de temperatuur van de aarde sinds 1850 al met 1,2° graden gestegen is en zware investeringen en dito inspanningen vereist zijn om een verdere stijging te vermijden. Experimenteel natuurkundige Gerd Ganteför ziet - anno 2023 - nog andere gevaren die veel belangrijker zijn, met name de kwestie van verdamping die in de NASA-studie niet werd besproken, maar wel in andere gepubliceerde studies. Grote windturbines vertragen logischerwijs de wind. Minder wind betekent minder verdamping en dus minder neerslag. Dit heeft invloed op de vochtige luchtstroom die vanuit de Noord-Atlantische Oceaan over zee naar Europa komt. Als het droger wordt, kan dit leiden tot een warmer klimaat. Vochtigheid en bodemvochtigheid zijn belangrijk voor de landbouw. Als er te veel windturbines worden geplaatst, heeft dit gevolgen voor het klimaat. https://nordkurier.de/politik/alarmierende-studie-klimaerwaermung-durch-windraeder-1625706 Er bestaan veel klimaatmodelberekeningen voor de hele planeet, maar die richten zich uitsluitend op de verandering van het klimaat door CO2-concentraties. (Let wel: het zijn slechts modellen die niet op feiten zijn gebaseerd! ). Over het effect van windturbines op het klimaat is zeer weinig bekend en .... het wordt helaas ook niet onderzocht. Het meten van de temperatuur van het landoppervlak is één van de parameters die worden gebruikt voor de beoordeling van de opwarming van de aarde. Er wordt luid geroepen dat de opwarming van de aarde wordt veroorzaakt door broeikasgassen en CO2, terwijl het al lang bekend is dat slechts 0,04% van onze atmosfeer uit CO2 bestaat en de impact van broeikasgassen beperkt is. Waarom wordt er geen rekening gehouden met de stijging van oppervlaktetemperatuur van de aarde die wordt veroorzaakt door windturbines (en mogelijk nog andere industriële installaties), de droogte die ze veroorzaken, verminderde verdamping en minder neerslag? Omdat ... windturbines een businessmodel zijn waar miljarden mee verdiend worden en er met een beweerde CO2 vervuiling ook een aardige cent te verdienen valt op de kap van de bevolking, de landbouw en de industrie. Overheden plannen tegen 2030 respectievelijk 2050 nog tienduizenden bijkomende windturbines ter land, in meren en oceanen.
    2 Reacties 0 Shares
  • Klimaat Terreur

    Kijk je naar de landkaart dan zie je dat de grootste smerige uitstoot van vandaag veroorzaakt word agv het groene beleid waaronder massa import van onduurzame rotzooi uit amerika en china zoals onduurzame onrendable brandgevaarlijke zonnepanelen windmolens kankerverwekkende windturbines etc en door zeeboten multinationals, de vervuiling komt niet door de boeren en ook niet door mestoverschot etc.

    Pesticiden en monsantos glyfosaat zijn kankerverwekkend evenwel zeer slecht voor flora en fauna zoals gebruikt in de landbouw sector.

    het groene links extreme verdienmodel is de doodsteek voor europa en flora en fauna

    Ik wens jullie heel veel wijsheid toe voor de aankomende verkiezingen.

    DEEL DIT BERICHT, DELEN, DELEN.
    Reacties zijn welkom.
    Met vriendelijke groet,
    Stan Rams
    Klimaat Terreur Kijk je naar de landkaart dan zie je dat de grootste smerige uitstoot van vandaag veroorzaakt word agv het groene beleid waaronder massa import van onduurzame rotzooi uit amerika en china zoals onduurzame onrendable brandgevaarlijke zonnepanelen windmolens kankerverwekkende windturbines etc en door zeeboten multinationals, de vervuiling komt niet door de boeren en ook niet door mestoverschot etc. Pesticiden en monsantos glyfosaat zijn kankerverwekkend evenwel zeer slecht voor flora en fauna zoals gebruikt in de landbouw sector. het groene links extreme verdienmodel is de doodsteek voor europa en flora en fauna Ik wens jullie heel veel wijsheid toe voor de aankomende verkiezingen. DEEL DIT BERICHT, DELEN, DELEN. Reacties zijn welkom. Met vriendelijke groet, Stan Rams
    Aardgasvrij wonen op haalbare en betaalbare wijze - Aardgastabé
    Vóór 2030 moeten 1,5 miljoen woningen van het aardgas af zijn. Aardgastabé zet zich in om op haalbare en betaalbare wijze van het gas af te gaan.
    0 Reacties 0 Shares
  • Stem straks niet op ruttes kartel of PvdA/groen ( dubbel. ) links.. anders gaat de prijs 5 keer duurder worden. Ze willen 10 000 verlies gevende belasting verslindende natuur verpestende windmolens plaatsen in de Noordzee!
    Volgens Timmermans is windenergie schone energie. Hij verteld er alleen niet bij dat Elke windturbine is vervuilend en om de paar jaar moet die worden voorzien van 2600 liter nieuwe smeerolie... weet dat een gemiddelde windmolen veel korter dan 15 jaar mee gaat. ( het break even point ligt vele malen hoger dan die 15 jaar!.) Hoezo moeten wij af van de fossiele brandstoffen? Laat je niet in de maling nemen door die klimaat gekken. Nee vluchten kan niet meer!
    In opstand komen tegen deze ....
    Stem straks niet op ruttes kartel of PvdA/groen ( dubbel. ) links.. anders gaat de prijs 5 keer duurder worden. Ze willen 10 000 verlies gevende belasting verslindende natuur verpestende windmolens plaatsen in de Noordzee! Volgens Timmermans is windenergie schone energie. Hij verteld er alleen niet bij dat Elke windturbine is vervuilend en om de paar jaar moet die worden voorzien van 2600 liter nieuwe smeerolie... weet dat een gemiddelde windmolen veel korter dan 15 jaar mee gaat. ( het break even point ligt vele malen hoger dan die 15 jaar!.) Hoezo moeten wij af van de fossiele brandstoffen? Laat je niet in de maling nemen door die klimaat gekken. Nee vluchten kan niet meer! In opstand komen tegen deze ....
    0 Reacties 0 Shares
  • https://twitter.com/balancealways/status/1694602845721374853 WIND TURBINES - This was a lake, now its just Kilometers of millions of tons of bubbling sludge, made up of toxic chemicals & radioactive waste
    This is where we mine Neodymium! A main component in Wind turbines. it’s fine, it’s saving the planet 🤡 #windturbines #ecocide
    https://twitter.com/balancealways/status/1694602845721374853 WIND TURBINES - This was a lake, now its just Kilometers of millions of tons of bubbling sludge, made up of toxic chemicals & radioactive waste This is where we mine Neodymium! A main component in Wind turbines. it’s fine, it’s saving the planet 🤡 #windturbines #ecocide
    1 Reacties 0 Shares
  • Dieselmotoren verstopt in windturbines in Schotland. De overheid verteld niet waarom die de turbines laten draaien.

    Hoofdfunctie van veel windturbines windmolens is Groene certificaten, belastingvoordelen en smeergeld. Veel windturbines zijn niet eens aangesloten op het elektriciteitsnet. https://twitter.com/Burgerfront1/status/1687340640009428992
    Dieselmotoren verstopt in windturbines in Schotland. De overheid verteld niet waarom die de turbines laten draaien. Hoofdfunctie van veel windturbines windmolens is Groene certificaten, belastingvoordelen en smeergeld. Veel windturbines zijn niet eens aangesloten op het elektriciteitsnet. https://twitter.com/Burgerfront1/status/1687340640009428992
    0 Reacties 0 Shares
Meer resultaten