• Poem

    “these are the days we rise up for freedom…”

    these are the days we rise up for freedom
    we come together and make the big change
    untill the day of liberation
    nothing can stop us

    With the hearts of love on our side
    (with the endless power of hearts)

    we never give up together we stand strong

    we break the chains united by love

    darkness wont harm as the sun rises

    so keep on shining now the future is yours

    Stan Rams

    Amsterdam

    12 12 2019


    The poem calls for collective action and spiritual strength in the face of oppression, emphasizing love and unity as forces for change.

    Structure: Ten-line single stanza, free verse, in English. The poem builds momentum with short, declarative lines, culminating in a hopeful vision.

    Imagery: Light and darkness contrast (“darkness wont harm,” “sun rises”), with spiritual imagery (“lord of love,” “endless power of hearts”) evoking divine support. The “chains” symbolize oppression, and the “sun” represents hope.

    Tone: Uplifting, defiant, and inspirational, with a collective “we” that rallies the reader.

    Style: Direct, anthemic, with repetition (“we,” “love”) and parentheses for emphasis. The English language targets a global audience.

    Relation: Stan Rams shares spiritual optimism, direct address (“you”), and themes of love and light overcoming darkness. Both envision a transformative journey,this poem is activist-oriented from introspective.

    Music Connection: The anthemic style suggests lyrics for protest or inspirational songs, like “Amsterdam Krishna world-peace dance” or “Dance for Peace.”,


    **********************
    **********************

    #poezie #poetry #inspiration #peace #revolution
    Poem “these are the days we rise up for freedom…” these are the days we rise up for freedom we come together and make the big change untill the day of liberation nothing can stop us With the hearts of love on our side (with the endless power of hearts) we never give up together we stand strong we break the chains united by love darkness wont harm as the sun rises so keep on shining now the future is yours Stan Rams Amsterdam 12 12 2019 The poem calls for collective action and spiritual strength in the face of oppression, emphasizing love and unity as forces for change. Structure: Ten-line single stanza, free verse, in English. The poem builds momentum with short, declarative lines, culminating in a hopeful vision. Imagery: Light and darkness contrast (“darkness wont harm,” “sun rises”), with spiritual imagery (“lord of love,” “endless power of hearts”) evoking divine support. The “chains” symbolize oppression, and the “sun” represents hope. Tone: Uplifting, defiant, and inspirational, with a collective “we” that rallies the reader. Style: Direct, anthemic, with repetition (“we,” “love”) and parentheses for emphasis. The English language targets a global audience. Relation: Stan Rams shares spiritual optimism, direct address (“you”), and themes of love and light overcoming darkness. Both envision a transformative journey,this poem is activist-oriented from introspective. Music Connection: The anthemic style suggests lyrics for protest or inspirational songs, like “Amsterdam Krishna world-peace dance” or “Dance for Peace.”, ********************** ********************** #poezie #poetry #inspiration #peace #revolution
    0 Комментарии 0 Поделились
  • #Idao4 the parked car looks a lot like a hyundai elantra/ Frames research analyse from the Kirstin Cameron Web cam video / https://videos.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2022/12/18/977573402011808223/640x360_MP4_977573402011808223.mp4 #elantra #

    Watch all PHOTOS please.

    My Audio Analyse

    Used multiple Audacity sound reductions/

    Analyse Part 1:


    On the video Kaylee G has darker hair and a black jacket, she quickens her pace and waves her arms.

    In the images we see Maddie walking next to Jack, a little behind them is Kaylee.

    Kaylee is wandering, and it looks like she had drunk quite a lot.

    It looks very much like only Maddie spoke to Jack and Kaylee did not say a word.

    Maddie walks more steadily, she has blonde hair, light clothes, and she wears the jeans with tears at the knees.

    Just the seconds during turning the corner after leaving the food truck, there is noise and no audio we could extract/ we dont know if they spoke, and what they she said.

    The moment they come around the corner M said: "Who's that?" that could mean... "Whois that" or "W h o was that"

    Did she just see someone? or dit she saw some one just before?

    The abbreviation can mean "who is that" or "who was that"

    Referring to "who" she could mean "some one he sees, he saw, someone who greeted, or spoke, some one they, saw just before at the food truck.

    She wants to know / she puts the emphasis hard on the words "THAT"

    If she intends the last one he spoke with? she does not know him and wants to know from J who that person was

    Because we have audio from this ( Kistin Cameron - Alina Smith) video, and not few seconds before they come around the corner, we don't know if Jack has said a name or a nickname, and if for example she asks afterwards "who is that?"

    There is a White Truck driving, she can see the truck comming their direction, maybe she sees that truck and asks J "who is that?"

    It seems she ment someone who was at the food truck, and not someone she sees in the distance, near the approaching white truck, which is at least 50 meters away.

    J responds: "Which is disguised, is a risico", "Which" can refer to someone in the truck or some one else/ from the food truck/ or some one we dont see on the video
    who is disquised, fe someone who drives the truck?, the passenger or someone who climbs onto the back of the loading space of that big white truck, or maybe he refers
    to undercover agents, or people from a gang?

    Maybe he explains that anyone who is in disguise, / who is disguised, is a risico" in general/ or he refers to someone who was disguised fe some one at the food truck
    maddie saw as well.

    He may have seen someone in the distance running after a white truck, and previously seen the people in that truck, or the person running behind and climbing onto the truck.

    From the moment they walk around the corner, Maddie says : "who's that" or "who was that"

    J responds: "Which is disguised, is a risiso". He explains that which is disguised, is a r i s i c o !

    The wors " which" "is" "a" pronounced by J in accentuated parts, with short pauses in between, it is a form of spelling/
    he pronounces the word risico at once

    Jack pronounces the entire sentence clearly and convincingly, he pronounces the sentence rhythmically/

    "who is dis gui sed is a risico, the word risico is not spoken in pieces but in one go.

    You can only hear this clearly by amplifying the audio and filtering out the noise.

    By slowing down the speed of the audio you can hear it even better, the vowels are clear enough to distinguish what exactly he is saying, the vowels and consonants are clear.

    Jack has a distinctive way of speaking, and a distinctive accent, the sound "am" or "em" "them" "uhm" as he pronounces are similar, given the conversation it seems very likely that Jack was referring to Adam.

    You can check your own tone, sound, accent speech by, for example, pronouncing the words "him" "them" "uhm".

    Some people swallow vowels, so you don't hear the first letter, such as an "H". Some people drown out a word with a vowel and then you hear, for example, the "H" sounding stronger than the rest of the word. This way everyone has a unique pronunciation and voice

    In summary, it looks like Maddie is concerned and wants to know who a person is that she saw with Jack at the food truck Jack doesn't say who that person is, he doesn't know him or does he? , and he says "which is disguised is a risico"

    More research is needed. We need to look at the video images, frame by frame, who is looking at whom, or where? when speaking, and whether there is anything to see that we had not noticed before.

    Let's do part two of the audio analysis first.


    *********************

    Audio Part 2

    ********************

    Analyse of the second part of the conversation

    Maddie says :" Jack" ! "What did you say to Adam"?

    Jack Responds : "Like, I told "em" Everything" or? "anything"

    The way Maddie addresses Jack seems somewhat angry, forceful, stressed

    J has a special language and accent, some vowels are restrained, sometimes swallowed, for example with the word "him" you hear "em" or "uhm",
    but the "h" tone can drown out the "i" from the word: "Him" and then you hear "hum" again/ because he responses to Maddie it looks very much like
    he meant "him" referring to "Adam"

    Some words could not be encrypted after "I Told them ( em) Everything"

    VIDEO Analyse

    A person disquised in black jumps into the White Truck

    Researchers should use advanced video software, and zoom in, make the image a little brighter, then by paying close attention to the video frame by frame, from the beginning / and from the moment you hear the white truck approaching, which is just out of view / then some secs later You can see for a moment a person disguised in black, is jumping into the car , the White Truck, we made a screenshot from the reflection of the man in black in the parked car.

    This can be of great importance for the research..

    Stan Rams

    independent researcher/video photo sound analyst/artist
    #Idao4 the parked car looks a lot like a hyundai elantra/ Frames research analyse from the Kirstin Cameron Web cam video / https://videos.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2022/12/18/977573402011808223/640x360_MP4_977573402011808223.mp4 #elantra # Watch all PHOTOS please. My Audio Analyse Used multiple Audacity sound reductions/ Analyse Part 1: On the video Kaylee G has darker hair and a black jacket, she quickens her pace and waves her arms. In the images we see Maddie walking next to Jack, a little behind them is Kaylee. Kaylee is wandering, and it looks like she had drunk quite a lot. It looks very much like only Maddie spoke to Jack and Kaylee did not say a word. Maddie walks more steadily, she has blonde hair, light clothes, and she wears the jeans with tears at the knees. Just the seconds during turning the corner after leaving the food truck, there is noise and no audio we could extract/ we dont know if they spoke, and what they she said. The moment they come around the corner M said: "Who's that?" that could mean... "Whois that" or "W h o was that" Did she just see someone? or dit she saw some one just before? The abbreviation can mean "who is that" or "who was that" Referring to "who" she could mean "some one he sees, he saw, someone who greeted, or spoke, some one they, saw just before at the food truck. She wants to know / she puts the emphasis hard on the words "THAT" If she intends the last one he spoke with? she does not know him and wants to know from J who that person was Because we have audio from this ( Kistin Cameron - Alina Smith) video, and not few seconds before they come around the corner, we don't know if Jack has said a name or a nickname, and if for example she asks afterwards "who is that?" There is a White Truck driving, she can see the truck comming their direction, maybe she sees that truck and asks J "who is that?" It seems she ment someone who was at the food truck, and not someone she sees in the distance, near the approaching white truck, which is at least 50 meters away. J responds: "Which is disguised, is a risico", "Which" can refer to someone in the truck or some one else/ from the food truck/ or some one we dont see on the video who is disquised, fe someone who drives the truck?, the passenger or someone who climbs onto the back of the loading space of that big white truck, or maybe he refers to undercover agents, or people from a gang? Maybe he explains that anyone who is in disguise, / who is disguised, is a risico" in general/ or he refers to someone who was disguised fe some one at the food truck maddie saw as well. He may have seen someone in the distance running after a white truck, and previously seen the people in that truck, or the person running behind and climbing onto the truck. From the moment they walk around the corner, Maddie says : "who's that" or "who was that" J responds: "Which is disguised, is a risiso". He explains that which is disguised, is a r i s i c o ! The wors " which" "is" "a" pronounced by J in accentuated parts, with short pauses in between, it is a form of spelling/ he pronounces the word risico at once Jack pronounces the entire sentence clearly and convincingly, he pronounces the sentence rhythmically/ "who is dis gui sed is a risico, the word risico is not spoken in pieces but in one go. You can only hear this clearly by amplifying the audio and filtering out the noise. By slowing down the speed of the audio you can hear it even better, the vowels are clear enough to distinguish what exactly he is saying, the vowels and consonants are clear. Jack has a distinctive way of speaking, and a distinctive accent, the sound "am" or "em" "them" "uhm" as he pronounces are similar, given the conversation it seems very likely that Jack was referring to Adam. You can check your own tone, sound, accent speech by, for example, pronouncing the words "him" "them" "uhm". Some people swallow vowels, so you don't hear the first letter, such as an "H". Some people drown out a word with a vowel and then you hear, for example, the "H" sounding stronger than the rest of the word. This way everyone has a unique pronunciation and voice In summary, it looks like Maddie is concerned and wants to know who a person is that she saw with Jack at the food truck Jack doesn't say who that person is, he doesn't know him or does he? , and he says "which is disguised is a risico" More research is needed. We need to look at the video images, frame by frame, who is looking at whom, or where? when speaking, and whether there is anything to see that we had not noticed before. Let's do part two of the audio analysis first. ********************* Audio Part 2 ******************** Analyse of the second part of the conversation Maddie says :" Jack" ! "What did you say to Adam"? Jack Responds : "Like, I told "em" Everything" or? "anything" The way Maddie addresses Jack seems somewhat angry, forceful, stressed J has a special language and accent, some vowels are restrained, sometimes swallowed, for example with the word "him" you hear "em" or "uhm", but the "h" tone can drown out the "i" from the word: "Him" and then you hear "hum" again/ because he responses to Maddie it looks very much like he meant "him" referring to "Adam" Some words could not be encrypted after "I Told them ( em) Everything" VIDEO Analyse A person disquised in black jumps into the White Truck Researchers should use advanced video software, and zoom in, make the image a little brighter, then by paying close attention to the video frame by frame, from the beginning / and from the moment you hear the white truck approaching, which is just out of view / then some secs later You can see for a moment a person disguised in black, is jumping into the car , the White Truck, we made a screenshot from the reflection of the man in black in the parked car. This can be of great importance for the research.. Stan Rams independent researcher/video photo sound analyst/artist
    1
    7 Комментарии 0 Поделились
  • kinderhandelaars zoals theresia /This is what a khasarian satanist child trafficker looks like
    Mother Teresa was a male
    She she funneled between 50 and $100 million a year to the Vatican and she did that by selling babies and young children
    **** that rat bastard *******
    kinderhandelaars zoals theresia /This is what a khasarian satanist child trafficker looks like Mother Teresa was a male She she funneled between 50 and $100 million a year to the Vatican and she did that by selling babies and young children **** that rat bastard *******
    1
    0 Комментарии 0 Поделились
  • Zeg het hardop.
    Aluminium.
    Glyfosaat, het belangrijkste ingrediënt in genetisch gemodificeerd voedsel, stimuleert het lichaam in feite om aluminium te accepteren en te absorberen.
    Glyfosaat en aluminium werken samen om een dubbele aanslag te plegen op de gezondheid van hersenen en darmen.
    Zowel glyfosaat als aluminium werken samen op een manier die de gezonde darmflora vernietigt.
    Glyfosaat verstoort de darmbacteriën, wat leidt tot een overgroei van Clostridium difficile.
    Het giftige product ervan, p-kresol, wordt in verband gebracht met autisme in zowel menselijke als muismodellen. p-Kresol bevordert de opname van aluminium.
    Wat bindt zich met fluoride om naar binnen te gaan en je pijnappelklier te verkalken?
    Aluminium!
    Glyfosaat chelateert aluminium, waardoor ingenomen aluminium de darmbarrière kan omzeilen. Dit leidt tot door bloedarmoede veroorzaakte hypoxie, wat neurotoxiciteit bevordert en de pijnappelklier beschadigt.
    Zowel glyfosaat als aluminium verstoren de cytochroom P450-enzymen, die betrokken zijn bij het melatoninemetabolisme.
    Bovendien is melatonine afgeleid van tryptofaan, waarvan de synthese in planten en microben door glyfosaat wordt geblokkeerd.
    Gevoelens, dwangneuroses, driften en gedachten worden allemaal in de psyche geïmplanteerd via HAARP-technologie en Wi-Fi dat een effect heeft op alles wat anorganisch is in de omtrek, zoals aluminiumafzettingen in het lichaam, die dienen als ontvangers en zenders in de pijnappelklier van de hersenen.
    Aluminium heeft een speciale affiniteit voor neurologisch weefsel.
    Het is geen toeval dat v******* zeer hoge concentraties van deze neurotoxine bevatten.
    Het is geen toeval dat ze aluminium in de atmosfeer sproeien.
    Het is geen toeval dat aluminium in deodorant zit.
    Het is geen toeval dat glyfosaat in ons voedsel zit en fluoride in ons water en beide werken synergetisch met aluminium.
    Onderwijs jezelf, zodat je jezelf en je familie kunt ontgiften van alle giftige metalen, voornamelijk, Aluminium en Fluoride.
    Zeg het hardop. Aluminium. Glyfosaat, het belangrijkste ingrediënt in genetisch gemodificeerd voedsel, stimuleert het lichaam in feite om aluminium te accepteren en te absorberen. Glyfosaat en aluminium werken samen om een dubbele aanslag te plegen op de gezondheid van hersenen en darmen. Zowel glyfosaat als aluminium werken samen op een manier die de gezonde darmflora vernietigt. Glyfosaat verstoort de darmbacteriën, wat leidt tot een overgroei van Clostridium difficile. Het giftige product ervan, p-kresol, wordt in verband gebracht met autisme in zowel menselijke als muismodellen. p-Kresol bevordert de opname van aluminium. Wat bindt zich met fluoride om naar binnen te gaan en je pijnappelklier te verkalken? Aluminium! Glyfosaat chelateert aluminium, waardoor ingenomen aluminium de darmbarrière kan omzeilen. Dit leidt tot door bloedarmoede veroorzaakte hypoxie, wat neurotoxiciteit bevordert en de pijnappelklier beschadigt. Zowel glyfosaat als aluminium verstoren de cytochroom P450-enzymen, die betrokken zijn bij het melatoninemetabolisme. Bovendien is melatonine afgeleid van tryptofaan, waarvan de synthese in planten en microben door glyfosaat wordt geblokkeerd. Gevoelens, dwangneuroses, driften en gedachten worden allemaal in de psyche geïmplanteerd via HAARP-technologie en Wi-Fi dat een effect heeft op alles wat anorganisch is in de omtrek, zoals aluminiumafzettingen in het lichaam, die dienen als ontvangers en zenders in de pijnappelklier van de hersenen. Aluminium heeft een speciale affiniteit voor neurologisch weefsel. Het is geen toeval dat v******* zeer hoge concentraties van deze neurotoxine bevatten. Het is geen toeval dat ze aluminium in de atmosfeer sproeien. Het is geen toeval dat aluminium in deodorant zit. Het is geen toeval dat glyfosaat in ons voedsel zit en fluoride in ons water en beide werken synergetisch met aluminium. Onderwijs jezelf, zodat je jezelf en je familie kunt ontgiften van alle giftige metalen, voornamelijk, Aluminium en Fluoride.
    0 Комментарии 0 Поделились
  • Belangrijke Informatie over Mondkapjes


    Mondkapjes houden wel druppels tegen in het afgedekte deel

    Mondkapjes werken echter niet,ze houden geen virussen, ziektekiemen, bacterien tegen, die zijn te klein

    kapjes houden op stoffige bouwlokaties stofdeeltjes tegen, maar geen kankerverwekkend fijnstof, zoals het fijnstof dat vrijkomt bij de verbranding van bomen in biomassa-centrales, en ze houden ook het inademen niet tegen van gifstoffen zoals deze voorkomen in smog

    zeer kleine ziektekiemen dringen het lichaam overigens binnen via het oogvocht, en via huid wondjes

    in zieken huizen is het dragen op operatiekamers nuttig, om te voorkomen dat artsen
    die hoesten, bacterien via druppels overbrengen op open wonden bij patienten op de ok

    bacterien

    Door het dragen van kapjes hopen zich in het kapje ziektekiemen/bacterien op

    Door een lager zuurstofgehalte/en een hoger cxo2 gehalte, zullen bepaalde bacterien zich veel sneller vermeerderen door het dragen van kapjes

    Zonlicht dood bacterien. Door het toedekken van de mond, kan geen zonlicht de afgedekte huidbacterien berijken .

    In kapjes kunnen schimmels, fibers en parasieten aanwezig zijn, waardoor de drager een significant hoger risico heeft
    op een parasitaire of een schimmel infectie, een antigeen shock, of longinfectie


    fabricage

    de filmbeelden bewijzen dat kapjes onder erbarmelijke niet propere omstandigheden in lage loonlanden worden gefabriceerd, zoals door kinderen in straatarme gezinnen die wonen in huizen waar deugdelijke sanitaire voorzieningen ontbreken.

    kapjes worden onder meer gesteriliseerd met de chemische verbinding Ethyleen Oxide, u kunt zelf controleren dat deze kankerverwekkende stof in de mondkapjes zit. Zie de bijsluiter.

    Ethyleen Oxide is zeer slecht, het is ook niet afbreekbaar door verbranding
    Heeft u enig idee wat de gevolgen voor het klimaat en de luchtveiligheid zijn van de globale circulatie van ruim 50 miljard mondkapjes in de wereld per jan 2022?

    ********************************************************************
    Belangrijke Informatie over Mondkapjes Mondkapjes houden wel druppels tegen in het afgedekte deel Mondkapjes werken echter niet,ze houden geen virussen, ziektekiemen, bacterien tegen, die zijn te klein kapjes houden op stoffige bouwlokaties stofdeeltjes tegen, maar geen kankerverwekkend fijnstof, zoals het fijnstof dat vrijkomt bij de verbranding van bomen in biomassa-centrales, en ze houden ook het inademen niet tegen van gifstoffen zoals deze voorkomen in smog zeer kleine ziektekiemen dringen het lichaam overigens binnen via het oogvocht, en via huid wondjes in zieken huizen is het dragen op operatiekamers nuttig, om te voorkomen dat artsen die hoesten, bacterien via druppels overbrengen op open wonden bij patienten op de ok bacterien Door het dragen van kapjes hopen zich in het kapje ziektekiemen/bacterien op Door een lager zuurstofgehalte/en een hoger cxo2 gehalte, zullen bepaalde bacterien zich veel sneller vermeerderen door het dragen van kapjes Zonlicht dood bacterien. Door het toedekken van de mond, kan geen zonlicht de afgedekte huidbacterien berijken . In kapjes kunnen schimmels, fibers en parasieten aanwezig zijn, waardoor de drager een significant hoger risico heeft op een parasitaire of een schimmel infectie, een antigeen shock, of longinfectie fabricage de filmbeelden bewijzen dat kapjes onder erbarmelijke niet propere omstandigheden in lage loonlanden worden gefabriceerd, zoals door kinderen in straatarme gezinnen die wonen in huizen waar deugdelijke sanitaire voorzieningen ontbreken. kapjes worden onder meer gesteriliseerd met de chemische verbinding Ethyleen Oxide, u kunt zelf controleren dat deze kankerverwekkende stof in de mondkapjes zit. Zie de bijsluiter. Ethyleen Oxide is zeer slecht, het is ook niet afbreekbaar door verbranding Heeft u enig idee wat de gevolgen voor het klimaat en de luchtveiligheid zijn van de globale circulatie van ruim 50 miljard mondkapjes in de wereld per jan 2022? ********************************************************************
    1
    0 Комментарии 0 Поделились