THE MILIBAND BROTHERS: CRIME SYNDICATE THE TIMELINE THAT NOW DEMANDS ANSWERS** And why today’s asbestos revelation makes Miliband’s silence untenable... For more than a year, the government has insisted that the UK–China “clean energy partnership” is nothing unusual — just routine cooperation, nothing to see here. But the timeline tells a very different story, and today’s news about asbestos found IN Chinese‑manufactured wind turbines turns this from a policy debate into a public‑safety and national‑security issue. Here is the sequence of events that now requires full transparency. 🔹 March 2025 — Ed Miliband signs a Memorandum of Understanding with China He travels to Beijing and signs a wide‑ranging MoU covering: - Offshore wind - Electricity grids - Battery storage - Carbon capture - Hydrogen These are not minor areas. These are **critical national‑infrastructure sectors**. 🔹 March 2025 – February 2026 — The MoU is kept out of public view** For almost a year, the agreement is not published, not debated in Parliament, and not disclosed to the public. No press release. No ministerial statement. No scrutiny. 🔹 27 February 2026 — The MoU is quietly released. No announcement. No explanation. It simply appears on a government website. The timing and the silence raise immediate questions. 🔹 Spring 2026 — Miliband repeatedly refuses to release the full details. Across multiple interviews, he: - Dodges direct questions - Repeats scripted lines about “normal cooperation” - Avoids explaining what China gains - Avoids explaining what UK infrastructure China may influence - Refuses to publish the full text or annexes This is not transparency This is avoidance 🔹 June 2026 — RUSI warns of deepening UK dependence on Chinese supply chains A respected defence think tank warns that the UK’s offshore‑wind expansion risks: - Strategic dependence - Supply‑chain vulnerability - Loss of control over critical components Miliband does not address these warnings directly. 🔹 TODAY — Asbestos found in Chinese‑manufactured wind turbines This is the moment everything changes. Asbestos is banned in the UK. It is a known carcinogen Its presence in imported turbine components is a **major regulatory failure**. This is no longer a theoretical risk. This is a **real‑world safety breach** involving the very sector Miliband has tied to deeper cooperation with China. THE QUESTIONS ED MILIBAND MUST NOW ANSWER: 1. Why did you refuse to release the full China MoU for so long? A year‑long delay followed by a quiet publication is not normal practice for a major international agreement. 2. Does the MoU expand Chinese involvement in UK offshore wind projects? The public deserves clarity on whether Chinese firms gain access to UK tenders, supply chains, or grid‑related work. 3. Were you aware of asbestos risks in imported turbine components? If yes, why was the public not informed? If no, why were safety checks inadequate? 4. What due‑diligence processes exist for foreign‑manufactured renewable‑energy components? Today’s revelation suggests they are either weak or non‑existent. 5. Will you now publish the full MoU, including annexes, technical notes, and implementation plans? Partial transparency is not transparency. 6. How will the government ensure that UK infrastructure is not compromised by unsafe or non‑compliant imports? This is a matter of public health and national security. 7. Why should the public trust your assurances when the supply chain has already failed at the most basic safety level? The asbestos discovery undermines every claim of “routine cooperation” and “nothing to worry about.” **WHY THIS MATTERS** This is not about geopolitics. This is not about party politics. This is about: - Public safety - Regulatory integrity - National infrastructure - Transparency in government When a minister signs an agreement with a foreign power covering critical infrastructure, the public has the right to know **exactly** what was agreed — especially when components from that same country are now found to contain banned carcinogenic materials. The refusal to release the MoU is no longer a procedural issue. It is now a **public‑interest emergency** Given The Potential Corruption of Two Brothers from the Marxist End of Labour. Ed handing out Huge Green Energy Contracts. Brother David sitting on the Board of a company seeking to make money from the same Contracts. IT IS TIME PARLIAMENT, AND THE POLICE TOOK AN INTEREST IN THE CHINESE DEAL https://x.com/PeteSanford/status/2068696142443880793

Don Lemon was participating in the attack. Lemon openly coordinated with Kima Armstrong, admitted foreknowledge of a “surprise operation,” withheld details to avoid tipping off targets, then joined activists storming a Christian church during worship. That’s conspiracy and obstruction. Lemon was interviewed by Minnesota AG Keith Ellison—the same official who spearheaded the wrongful prosecution of Derek Chauvin—and Ellison proudly promoted the segment. There is no First Amendment right to disrupt a church, intimidate worshippers, or obstruct lawful activity. Speech doesn’t include invasion. Assembly doesn’t include coercion. If a lawyer helps plan a robbery, he’s not just “observing.” Same rule applies here. The media doesn’t get immunity for crimes just because they bring a camera. https://x.com/TheBrancaShow/status/2013476586150838739 #lemon analyse Quote and Full ContextThe most widely circulated and quoted version from multiple video clips, news reports, and X posts is: "Watch this guy here, look, hugging his kid. And, you know, I imagine it's uncomfortable and traumatic for the people here, but... careful, it's very slippery right here. [...] but that's what protesting is about." He says this while filming a father embracing and comforting his visibly upset child amid the chaos. In some slightly varied transcriptions from clips (due to audio quality or editing), it's phrased as "It's uncomfortable and traumatic for the people here, but that's really what protesting is about" or "It is traumatic for the people, and that's what protesting is about." This moment has been heavily clipped and shared , often with captions emphasizing that Lemon appears to justify or downplay the impact on children while narrating it live. https://x.com/markkayeshow/status/2013285524958491000

All places of worship—synagogues, mosques, churches, temples, and beyond—deserve absolute respect and protection from any form of disturbance or intimidation. The First Amendment safeguards religious freedom, and laws like the FACE Act (18 U.S.C. § 248) explicitly prohibit intentional interference with worship services through force, threats, or obstruction, regardless of the protesters' cause. This applies equally to all faiths, and disruptions like the one at Cities Church in St. Paul, Minnesota, on January 18, 2026, set a dangerous precedent if not addressed firmly. We condemn the actions of Don Lemon and the group of activists who stormed Cities Church in St. Paul, Minnesota, in clear violation of the FACE Act. Christians everywhere should demand that the Department of Justice arrest those who participated. We must protect religious liberty in this country. Concern about escalation is shared by many critics: If no accountability follows, it could encourage copycat disruptions of religious services (Christian, Jewish, or others) amid heated immigration debates. Lemon fired Don Lemon was fired from CNN in April 2023 after 17 years with the network. Based on reports from CNN itself, major outlets like BBC, AP News, and Wikipedia, as well as Lemon's own statements, the primary reasons cited were a series of on-air controversies and behind-the-scenes issues: Sexist comments about Nikki Haley: In February 2023, during a discussion on "CNN This Morning," Lemon said the then-51-year-old Republican presidential candidate was not "in her prime" (defining a woman's prime as her 20s, 30s, or maybe 40s). This drew widespread backlash as misogynistic, leading to an apology, time off air for "sensitivity training," and criticism from Haley herself. bbc.com +3 A Variety investigation detailed a history of reported incidents, including Lemon allegedly calling female colleagues "fat," questioning Soledad O'Brien's Black identity in a staff meeting, and other claims of sexist or racist remarks. He had previously been demoted to weekends and reportedly barred from co-hosting with women due to complaints. Additional on-air gaffes included arguing men's soccer deserved higher pay because it's "more entertaining" and asking a contributor if a verbal slip was due to "mommy brain." en.wikipedia.org +1 Lemon s move to the morning show was seen as a "disastrous run" with low viewership. Some sources also note a tense interview with Vivek Ramaswamy as a contributing factor, though not the main one. The Department of Justice (DOJ) has already launched an investigation into the January 18, 2026, disruption at Cities Church in St. Paul, Minnesota, where protesters (with Don Lemon livestreaming and participating) entered during a worship service, screaming slogans like "ICE out," confronted the pastor, and caused the service to halt amid fear among congregants (including families and children). Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon (Civil Rights Division) announced the probe, stating it examines potential violations of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act (18 U.S.C. § 248). This federal law prohibits:Using force, threats of force, or physical obstruction to intentionally injure, intimidate, or interfere with someone seeking to exercise religious freedom (including attending or conducting worship services). Don Lemon is a blithering idiot and what he did by storming that church is criminal. That cannot be tolerated in the United States of America and he needs to go to jail for it. Trespassing at the very least. Inciting violence comes to mind if anyone was hurt in the ordeal. That church should press charges. https://x.com/SonnaSamson/status/2013204619896238328 Damaging or destroying property of a place of religious worship because of its religious character. It applies to houses of worship (churches, synagogues, mosques, etc.) and carries penalties including fines and prison time (up to 1 year for first offenses involving non-violent obstruction; higher for force or injury). The FACE Act was originally for clinic access but explicitly protects religious services from similar interference. "Lemon claimed the MAGA administration is making stuff up, and that he didn’t storm the church. On his livestream Don Lemon stated “people need to feel terrified. This is what protesting is all about”— after seeing children running out of the church scared." https://x.com/iAnonPatriot/status/2013087932349923582 "This incident illustrates just how committed many on the Left are to the insane narrative that any enforcement of immigration law, any deportation of illegal aliens (whom even Obama deported, by the way) is some sort of Nazi abuse. They're willing to disrupt the sacredness of a church service to demonize law and order. They're willing to alienate peaceful Americans to spread their radical message. If they did this once, there's no guarantee they won't do it again. It is important, not just for justice in this case, but for religious freedom in America that these agitators get arrested and face charges for what they did here. I thank @AGPamBondi and @HarmeetKDhillon for taking this seriously" https://x.com/Tyler2ONeil/status/2013097848007536679 "Leftists storming churches in Minnesota and disrupting services is not the First Amendment. Churches are private property. Worship isn’t a protest zone. This isn’t speech, it’s trespassing and harassment" https://x.com/the_jefferymead/status/2013112364762087439 Storming a Sunday worship service is not “protest.” It’s lawless intimidation. What happened at Cities Church was an anti-Christian power play: activists disrupting prayer, frightening families, and desecrating worship because they hate lawful authority. This wasn’t about “justice.” It was about dominion who is allowed to gather, who is allowed to worship, and who must submit to the mob. A society that excuses this will not stop with churches they dislike. And churches that refuse to name this as evil will not be spared next time. Christ’s church is not a public square. It is holy ground and it must be defended as such. https://x.com/the_jefferymead/status/2013112364762087439 "Any violation of federal law will be prosecuted." White House and Trump administration officials (e.g., Press Secretary) condemned it as intolerable harassment of Christians in sacred spaces.As of January 19, 2026 (today), no arrests or charges have been reported against Lemon or the protesters. Investigations like this involve gathering evidence (e.g., video from Lemon's stream, witness statements, intent assessment), which takes time—days to weeks or longer before decisions on prosecution. Concern about escalation is shared by many critics: If no accountability follows, it could encourage copycat disruptions of religious services (Christian, Jewish, or others) amid heated immigration debates. The law exists precisely to deter that by treating intentional interference with worship as a federal civil rights crime—similar to how it's enforced against pro-life activists at clinics. Prosecution would send a clear message that such actions cross protected lines, regardless of political motivation.The incident remains fast-moving. The DOJ probe is the mechanism in play right now—no "allowing" Lemon's actions; they're actively scrutinizing them under FACE Act protections for places like churches and synagogues. If evidence supports charges (e.g., obstruction/intimidation during worship), arrests could follow. I'll note any major updates as they emerge. #lemon #FACE #DOJ

Volkert van der Graaf eerste interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GaCX2_YplU

Herman Brood last interview.. 23 okt 2006 Kleine documentaire over Herman Brood, uitgezonden 1 dag na zijn dood. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttYtXTGN-E0

https://youtu.be/KkZt7FXOvbM 3 nov 2013 Radio uitzending van 14 November 1981 van het NCRV programma Los Vast rubriek backstage gepresenteerd door Jan Rietman geen super geluid maar wel leuk om Herman weer even te horen. ( interview) Herman Brood was in 1981 te gast bij Jan Rietman ( interview)

Herman Brood interview op Pinkpop 1988 Herman Brood interview op pinkpop, plus 3 songs 1988 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UGBFkgRZS8

17 sep 2014 Verschillende interviews met Herman Brood. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYgNojLbxDM

NINA HAGEN & HERMAN BROOD 1996 Interview on DUTCH TV Rare and funny Nina Hagen interview in Amsterdam, Holland, with Herman Brood, they talk about their old rock 'n' roll memories. Featuring Nina Hagen son Otis. Broadcasted on Dutch TV SBS in 1996. #ninahagen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShWad7FmqQY

LuMens #313 Bert Weteringe, onderzoeksjournalist en auteur 'Windhandel' #windmolens zijn heel heel erg slecht v florsa en fauna en vd economie. podcast seizoen 3, aflevering 13 (S03E13) Onderzoek openbaart windmolen waanzin Voor deze aflevering reizen we af naar het Overijsselse plaatsje Raalte, om in gesprek te gaan met Bert Weteringe. Bert is vliegtuigbouwkundig ingenieur, onderzoeksjournalist en auteur van het vorig jaar verschenen boek ‘Windhandel’. De afgelopen jaren heeft hij diepgaand onderzoek gedaan naar de schadelijke impact van windturbines. Met zijn onderzoeken, artikelen, lezingen en interviews, informeert hij mensen over de verwoestende uitwerking van de klimaatagenda op onze samenleving en de natuur. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_UGLQ_b3MA